Practicing in multiple states comes with its own set of challenges and benefits. In this new series, we’re speaking with Dorsey attorneys with dual-state practices to explore how multistate licensure has impacted their careers, improved their ability to serve clients, and created new opportunities.
In this first installment, we spoke with Colorado and California Partner Maral Shoaei about the opportunities and challenges of multistate licensure.
Maral manages a diverse range of matters in Commercial Litigation, including complex commercial disputes, intellectual property matters, antitrust cases, and federal agency investigations. Her ability to navigate complex legal nuances across state lines enables her to handle a broader range of cases and take on more challenging matters.
Q: Are there specific areas of your practice that particularly benefit from your dual-state knowledge?
A: This dual licensure has made my practice more versatile and diverse, enabling me to collaborate with a broader range of clients. Practicing in both California and Colorado has significantly expanded my cross-border litigation work, particularly with clients from China and Canada. The increase in cross-border litigation since becoming barred in California has been substantial, enhancing my ability to assist with a variety of matters effectively.
Q: Why did you decide to have multistate licensure? How has practicing in two major markets shaped your professional perspective and contributed to your career growth?
A: My multistate licensure initially stemmed from the necessity of relocating for my husband's job, but it has greatly contributed to my professional growth. It has opened doors to new partnerships and clients, provided opportunities to offer diverse perspectives, and significantly expanded my work practice and reach both across Dorsey and client. This experience has brought tremendous positivity and value to my practice.
Q: What are some challenges you face when managing cross-jurisdictional cases, and how do you ensure seamless service for clients across both states?
A: Understanding and implementing the applicable rules plays a vital role in my practice as I navigate two distinct jurisdictions: Colorado and California. Further, there is a significant difference in the general dynamics between the two states. Colorado's legal community is smaller and more close-knit, while California, being much larger, often involves working with professionals who may adopt a more aggressive approach. While this isn’t always the case, it does influence how I tailor my practice in each state. Understanding and adapting to the personality and style of opposing counsel is crucial for effectively managing cases.
Q: What advice would you give to other attorneys considering multistate licensure for expanding their practice or serving a broader client base?
A: I encourage other attorneys to consider obtaining licensure in states where Dorsey isn’t active or doesn’t have offices, such as Florida, Illinois, or Indiana. I often need attorneys barred in other states to assist with matters without having to rely on local counsel. Multistate licensure also enhances cross-selling opportunities.